Bracket, Divide, Label
Borrowed idea: Which two rows of the table should you use? The scored answer comes from the narrowest pair of inputs that straddles the target, and the wide pair that merely looks tidy is the usual wrong choice. Find the target first, then walk outward until two data inputs cage it. Divide the change in output by the change in input between those two, and nothing else. Have you written the two inputs and the two outputs on one line before dividing anything? Do you need the value at the target itself? No, because the bracket only uses its endpoints. Does the spacing have to be even? Not for this move, since the quotient is defined for any two distinct inputs. What the spacing does control is the error, and a bracket twice as wide is roughly twice as far from the tangent. Attach units of output per input to the number, and a number without them is only half an answer. Then say in words what that rate means in the setting of the problem.
| Table gives | Target | What to use |
|---|
| 2,4,6,10 | 5 | Bracket [4,6]: the only pair that cages 5 |
| 2,4,6,10 | 7 | Bracket [6,10]: uneven widths are fine |
| 2,4,6,10 | 4 | Bracket [2,6], since 4 has a neighbor on each side |
| r′ values | r′′ at a target | Same bracket, units compound once more |
| Only one side available | endpoint | One-sided quotient, and say so |
① Take any released table and compute every possible pair, then rank the results by how close each sits to the tangent. The tight bracket wins every time, and the margin is easy to feel after three tables.
② Recompute one estimate with the interval doubled in width. Note how the answer drifts toward the average slope of the whole stretch, which is the failure the wider pair produces.
③ Practise writing the interpretation in one sentence with all three pieces: the input, the direction, and the units. Say it out loud before you write it.